...Fair enough jbart, but the original assault started with this (his words):
This is a book that I was not consulted for, and I DO NOT approve of it's publication--nor is it a Ford Licensed publication.
The GT/CS Registry DOES NOT approve of this book, either. I was not notified, nor invited to this event.
I was not asked for permission to use the "short history" section, which is propretiary, and copyrighted in my 1989 and 1996 editons.
This speaks volumes of the intent of this book, and what's (really) going on over at CS.com, and why I left it for SAAC Forums.
You don't have to think too far to connect the dots why this book was done.
Paul M. Newitt
GT/CS Registrar.
To me, this has been an unacceptable and untruthful trend that has gone on for a long time without check and is the sole reason I defend THIS resourse! Many will indeed call it childish, and to that end, I sometimes wish I wasn't such the history buff, 'cuz it aint always pretty. Nonetheless, it is what it is and if you want to keep people from commenting adversely, deal with the creator of these "divisions" and stop helping him maintain his authoritative illusions.
To not place them in check as we have the right to do here will only encourage other friends with original thought as Cory to continue getting slammed on your other site and thus, more division. Personally, I could care less about your conversations over there - I won't join SAAC to correct their record, but for honor sake of this - my home - I reserve the right to speak in favor of free-flowing helpful information without "copyright, license, permission, approval" and so on... Had I thought I needed what he implies - I would never have chosen the GT/CS as my car of cars.........>
Love the Rat Fink on page 129!! 
