• Welcome to the CaliforniaSpecial.com forums! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all our site features, please take a moment to join our community! It's fast, simple and absolutely free.

    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

    Please Note: If you are an existing member and your password no longer works, click here to reset it.

1968 Underside floor question

classicsguy

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 21, 2002
Messages
1,519
Is RED OXIDE PRIMER the correct factory color for the underside of the 1968 GT/CS?
 

ari guy

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 31, 2011
Messages
68
As I understand it, the underside was painted with all the drippings of the colors the factory was painting at that time, they were dribbled into a big barrel and 'whatever' shade of mud that resulted was shot under the next set of cars. Today at car shows all you will see is red oxide primer, and at MCA shows, some clowns that should not be judges will dock you points if it is NOT red oxide primer and original, happened in my day when I used to show cars.
 

Mosesatm

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
9,009
But it should be some shade of red oxide because that's what they started with before they dumped in the other colors. The underside of my car is almost pink so they must have painted a lot of white and yellow cars that day!
 

robert campbell

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
4,321
My car is sorta a "coppery" brown. The one thing that really sticks out is has a very high gloss to it. It is in no way a flat color.

Rob
 

Ruppstang

Well-known member
Joined
May 22, 2009
Messages
3,032
As I understand it, the underside was painted with all the drippings of the colors the factory was painting at that time, they were dribbled into a big barrel and 'whatever' shade of mud that resulted was shot under the next set of cars. Today at car shows all you will see is red oxide primer, and at MCA shows, some clowns that should not be judges will dock you points if it is NOT red oxide primer and original, happened in my day when I used to show cars.

Well I am one of those MCA clowns a 67-68 gold card gold card judge. I am sorry you may have a bad experance in the past at a MCA event. You must know every judge does not have the same experance. They travel many miles at their own expence and work hard under some tough conditions to judge cars for some people who are very ingrateful for what was given them.
Regarding the under body primer each of the assembly plant did things differently. The San Jose plant used a mudy redish brown primer. All GT-CS were built in the San Jose plant. The Dearborn plant was the one who mixed the left over paint. The color of the day! Marty
 

ari guy

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 31, 2011
Messages
68
Sorry Marty, didnt mean to step on any toes. I too have done a bit of judging as well as showing, and understand both sides of the equation. And thanks for clearing up the left-over paint mix was at the Dearborn plant only on the under body primer, and thus would not apply to GT/CS cars.
 

dalorzo_f

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
1,886
Location
Brisbane Australia
The red oxide was an epoxy sealer/primer... low gloss, not flat, and waterproof.

And I've seen reference that even as such, it was not 100% consistent across the entire model year, salmon pinkish to muddy brown... so it may have had some slops added which could affect hue across the range of cars made in San Jose for any given year (or day, or week, depending).

Have also seen reference to variations in Metuchen from the "basic black", but still in the "dark-gray-to-black range" as it appears they may have reused some excess paint and adjusted the color from time-to-time to eliminate waste.
 

Ruppstang

Well-known member
Joined
May 22, 2009
Messages
3,032
The red oxide was an epoxy sealer/primer... low gloss, not flat, and waterproof.

And I've seen reference that even as such, it was not 100% consistent across the entire model year, salmon pinkish to muddy brown... so it may have had some slops added which could affect hue across the range of cars made in San Jose for any given year (or day, or week, depending).

Have also seen reference to variations in Metuchen from the "basic black", but still in the "dark-gray-to-black range" as it appears they may have reused some excess paint and adjusted the color from time-to-time to eliminate waste.

You are right about the inconsistancies. but the most common that I have seen is the muddy brown. Most people that ask a question want a singular answer not a range. I have found it best to do a little dective work and in most cases you can find your answer on your own car. And that is the correct color what ever shade. If it is something weird document it as I am sure you will be asked about it by the judges. Marty
 

Mosesatm

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
9,009
Some other forums claim there were 2 distinct colors used in San Jose in 1968.

Muddy brown and salmon pink.
I'm pretty sure both of these cars have the salmon pink.
First photo is my car and the 2nd is Jason's
 

Attachments

  • Underside.jpg
    Underside.jpg
    88.4 KB · Views: 31
  • Undercarriage 2.jpg
    Undercarriage 2.jpg
    102 KB · Views: 35

Ruppstang

Well-known member
Joined
May 22, 2009
Messages
3,032
Another thing that makes it kind of tricky is that as the paint oxidized the color changes a bit. You are right the first is very pink but the second looks like the brown that is oxidized. Marty
 

dalorzo_f

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
1,886
Location
Brisbane Australia
Agree 100% on the " Most people that ask a question want a singular answer not a range. " But the reality is that there was variation, not a one-size-fits-all answer.

Especially on items like this that were never relaly documents by Ford (whoda thunk in ''67 40+ years on it would be being debated?). So either pick a "red oxide" and go with it, or try to find unmolested originals from the same day or week as yours as comps... kinda hard to do.

As for pics on the web, time of day, angle, surrounding surfaces/background, ambient/artifical lighting, flash, etc can make the same color vary wildly...

As for documenting from the car, yes. But if it is off the "one-size-fits-all" answer on the judging sheet you're lost.

So the choices are:

1. accept conventional wisdom and take the one-size-fits-all answer, and if you show hope its accepted
2. do your own research, make a decision, and live with it
3. pick a "red oxide" and accept its "close"

No easy answer that will please everyone. Went for option #3 on mine...

Here's the original unrestored:
CIMG1422_med.jpg

CIMG1456.jpg

CIMG1410_med.jpg

And the repaint:
coupe_prep_03.jpg
 
Last edited:

Ruppstang

Well-known member
Joined
May 22, 2009
Messages
3,032
On a San Jose car I would not deduct if it were any color of red oxite. It it was detailed like one of the other plants that is a different story. Your car was in nice condition to start with. A tip for those wanting to find their correct color, look above the rear axel in the tunnel usualy where there is a greasy mess use some solvent to remove it and even on a rusty car you can find your own original color. Here is what I ended up with. Marty
 

Attachments

  • HCS red oxite.jpg
    HCS red oxite.jpg
    6.6 KB · Views: 31

dalorzo_f

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
1,886
Location
Brisbane Australia
Thanks.

I though it was a decent find, even if all the primer (and excessive overspray!) on the rear 1/4's hid some hideous welding by the PO that was covered by about 1/2" of "bog' (Oz speak for bondo!") so all the rear 1/4 rich red was after market, all came off and all new metal put on...

The spot you note was one where the OEM color was left. The respray was "close"... enough for me...!
 

Russ

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 25, 2003
Messages
393
Location
Flagstaff, AZ
Marty,
My, highland green GT/CS has its factory primer underneath, with its many drips and runs. I decided to just scrub the paint and leave it alone for showing. It is much more pink than brown. You judged my lime gold car at VA Beach which I decided to repaint over the original finish, and it is more brown than pink, but it still has many, many drips and runs. As you stated, if the color is red oxide, no points should be deducted, BUT I think that if the drips and runs are removed, there should be a deduction.
Russ Furstnow, MCA '67-'68 Certified Judge
 

J_Speegle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Messages
488
Is RED OXIDE PRIMER the correct factory color for the underside of the 1968 GT/CS?

Just to clarify a thing or two ;) the paint is not really a primer (read flat open texture) but a red oxide colored epoxy primer. As mentioned there are a number of different "tones and tints" depending on when the car was sprayed at San Jose. The epoxy primer/sealer produced a smooth slightly glossy finish originally that better protected the floor pans from the elements than a simple red oxide primer would have

Different tone often used from the firewall forward than what was used from the firewall rearward ;)

All listed (if I recall correctly) in the new book :rolleyes:

Hope this helps
 
Top